Ayana Kuanyshbay
Cultural Studies/E
September 16, 2014
EO1 Test
1. (10pts) Imagine Julius Caesar had never been born. How the history of Rome would had been different without him in the picture? Would it have shifted to an Empire? Elaborate on your thoughts.
I think it would be completely different. First of all Rome wouldn’t be a strong and powerful republic and I think Rome would sooner or later fall apart. Rome wouldn’t hold that long. Second of all I think people of Rome would be different, like Julius made himself the only ruler and that helped because he kept everyone under control, but if he wasn’t in the history the roman people would be not under control and it would be a mess. Third of all if there was no Julius there would not be Augustus. Also without Julius Rome wouldn’t even be in history, but if Rome would be in history without Julius then it wouldn’t be so important. Julius Caesar left his mark after himself in history.
2. (10 pts) Describe what factors led to the decline of the Roman Empire?
Roman Empire fell because a lot of reasons. The first reason is that other countries or empires wanted to conquer to the land and expand their empire. Second reason is that the empire stopped expanding and getting bigger. The third reason is that the emperor couldn’t keep the large empire in control, it was too hard. The fourth reason is that Rome was not having enough of supplies and most of the soldiers and people started to die. Fifth reason is that maybe in the empire many people traded their emperor and traded people to conquer the empire. And finally the sixth is maybe many people fought for the throne and to have the power.
3. (10pts) Describe the significance of Constantine moving the capital From Rome to Constantinople.
Constantine had a great idea of moving the capital to Constantinople, because Constantinople was a great location for trading with Europe and with other countries. Also Constantinople was near lands so the Romans did not needed to travel over the seas. They mostly traded by lands, much easier. They earned a lot of money and a lot of goods by moving the capital.
4. (10pts) Describe the similarities and differences between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church.
Roman Catholic Church:
1) Their army were in Latin or Local languages
2) Priests could not marry
3) Popes were more important than kings and emperors. This means that the king or emperor couldn’t give orders to the Pope. The Pope gives the orders to all kings and emperor. The Pope had all of the power.
4) Pope has the authority over all bishops.
Eastern Orthodox Church:
1) Their military were in Greek or local languages
2) Priests could marry
3) The emperor claims the authority over all religious leaders. That means that kings or emperors could give orders to the pope. The kings and emperors had the power over religious leaders.
4) The patriarchs and other bishops head the church as a group.
Similarities:
1) I think that the religion was the most important thing for them.
2) They always had someone in the society that was more importer then themselves.
5. (10 pts) Which legacy of Rome do you feel was the most important and why?
I think the most important legacy was the legacy of architecture and engineering of Rome, because Romans made unique and beautiful architecture that they developed throughout years and their architecture is still alive now days. If you visit Rome you can see how they built the buildings and you can see the beauty. Rome developed a new way of building much stronger buildings that no one developed before them and some of the people are using this method still. They also invented new things that helped them to make their life style much easier. Also they made the Roman rode that helped them to transport and trade with other countries. Also when the emperor gave orders or sent mails they came much faster, rather than waiting 6 months for one letter.
6. (10 pts) Which leader split the empire into an Eastern and Western Empire?
The Leader who split the Eastern and Western Empire was Disction